Legal Opinion

Upham v. Banister

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1931No. 3682PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, J.'

The plaintiff, H. W. Banister, instituted this suit in the district court of Foard county, Tex., against the defendants S. P. Upham and the First State Bank of Crowell,-to recover the sum of $1,500, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent, per annum.

The plaintiff alleged that on June 11, 1929, for a cash consideration of $1,500, he, as lessor, sold, executed, and delivered to S. P. Upham, as lessee, a lease for oil, gas,' and other minerals covering twenty acres of land which is sufficiently described in his petition. A copy of the lease contract is attached to, and made…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Simpson v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Miller v. DeahlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Bouldin v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Olympia Mining & Milling Co. v. KernsIdaho Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. Vandor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  2. Campbell v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Cooper Co. v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Herber v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Mercury Gas & Oil Corp. v. Rincon Oil & Gas Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API