Legal Opinion

United States v. Medeiros

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1989No. Crim. 88-00153PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MUIR, District Judge.

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

I. Introduction.

Defendant Anthony G. Medeiros requests that we sentence him to a term of imprisonment in this case that is below the range of imprisonment dictated for this case by the federal sentencing guidelines. We must decide whether we have the authority to sentence Medeiros to a term of imprisonment less than that prescribed by the sentencing guidelines, and, if so, whether we choose to exercise this discretion.

II. Procedural and Factual History.

On September 16, 1988, a grand jury returned a one-count indictment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Ryan, JeremiahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Dimitrise Uca, Appellant/no. 88-1607. United States of America v. Brahim Hodzic, Appellant/no. 88-1614Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Cary Thomas GoldbaumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Anthony G. MedeirosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Reap v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  4. United States v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. InterBusiness Bank, N.A. v. First National Bank of MifflintownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API