Loftus v. Hayden
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
This is an appeal in a medical malpractice case from a pre-trial order of the Superior Court determining that a medical expert was not qualified to testify.
i
A full statement of the facts appears in the Superior Court opinion, Loftus v. Hayden, Del.Super., 379 A.2d 1136 (1977), to which reference is made. For present purposes, we need record only that, in support of their claim for damages (direct and derivative) for injuries allegedly caused by defendant doctor during performance of a laparoscopy at the Wilmington Medical Center, plaintiffs proposed to introduce the expert…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Peters v. GelbSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- Peters v. GelbSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Raitt v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Loftus v. HaydenSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
3Cited by23 opinions
- New Castle County v. Hartford Accident And Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Bonesmo v. Nemours FoundationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- New Castle County v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Zills v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Barriocanal v. GibbsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.