Duane W. Sanders v. Harold W. Clarke, Warden, Nebraska State Prison
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
In this habeas appeal we consider the intersection between the procedure counsel must follow to withdraw from a frivolous appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and the standards for effective assistance of counsel set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The District Court held the no-merit brief filed by defendant’s counsel did not comply with Anders, and then, believing no showing of prejudice was necessary to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, conditionally…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Joel R. Evans v. Harold W. Clarke, Warden of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Duane W. Sanders v. Harold W. Clarke, Warden, Nebraska State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Herrick v. BerryhillDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019