Legal Opinion

Duane W. Sanders v. Harold W. Clarke, Warden, Nebraska State Prison

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1988No. 87-2197PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

In this habeas appeal we consider the intersection between the procedure counsel must follow to withdraw from a frivolous appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and the standards for effective assistance of counsel set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The District Court held the no-merit brief filed by defendant’s counsel did not comply with Anders, and then, believing no showing of prejudice was necessary to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, conditionally…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Joel R. Evans v. Harold W. Clarke, Warden of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Duane W. Sanders v. Harold W. Clarke, Warden, Nebraska State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  5. Herrick v. BerryhillDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API