Legal Opinion
State v. Thomas
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1989No. C-6880PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
MAUZY, Justice.
The court’s opinion and judgment of May 25, 1988 is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
The issue in this original proceeding is whether the Attorney General, on behalf of state agencies, has the right to intervene in electric utility rate cases before the Public Utility Commission. Central Power & Light Company and Houston Lighting & Power Company petitioned the Public Utility Commission for preferential accounting treatment for costs related to the South Texas Nuclear Project. The Attorney General, representing state agencies as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by29 opinions
- Flores v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- City of El Paso v. Public Utility Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Coastal Habitat Alliance v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Texas v. Ysleta Del Sur PuebloDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1999
- All Star Imports, Inc. D/B/A World Car Mazda North// Mazda Motor of North America, Inc. A/K/A Mazda Motor of America, Inc. v. Board of the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles, and Mazda Motor of North America, Inc. A/K/A Mazda Motor of America, Inc.// Cross-Appellee, All Star Imports, Inc. D/B/A World Car Mazda North, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.