Legal Opinion
O. v. Glastonbury Board of Education
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 1, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00690Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MR. and MRS. O, on their own behalf and as next friends of J.O. Plaintiffs, No. 3:20-cv-00690 (VAB) v. GLASTONBURY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION On May 18, 2020, Mr. and Mrs. O. (“Plaintiffs” or “Parents”) filed a lawsuit against the Board of Education of Glastonbury, Connecticut (“Defendant” or “the Board”), alleging that Glastonbury violated the right of their son (“Student”) to a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
20 U.S.C. § 1400
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Maureen Deal Phillip Deal, Parents, on Behalf of Zachary Deal v. Hamilton County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- E.M. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- T.P. & S.P. Ex Rel. S.P. v. Mamaroneck Union Free School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- M.W. ex rel. S.W. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.