Legal Opinion
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of Illinois v. Rage Administrative & Marketing Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 8, 1999No. Civil Action 98-2243-KHVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of Illinois seeks a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify certain insureds in a civil action brought against them in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. The matter now comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings And/Or For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 19) filed September 28, 1998, and defendants’ Cross Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. #25) filed November 9, 1998. For reasons stated more fully below, the Court finds that…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Northland Casualty Co. v. HBE Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- Soto v. WalmartDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023