Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Colorado Central Power Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 5, 1934No. 13,091PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as Fisher, defendant in error as the Power Company, the Acme Sand and Gravel Company as the Gravel Company, one Gerald Y. Stack as Stack, and one A. J. Collins as Collins.

The Power Company sued Fisher and Stack, as co-partners doing business as the Gravel Company, for a balance of approximately $900 and interest, dne on open account for electric power furnished for the operation of a gravel pit. Fisher denied that he was a partner. The cause was tried to the court and the Power Company had judgment. To review that judgment Fisher prosecutes this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. KeelySupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  2. Rocky Mountain Nat. Bank v. McCaskillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Booth v. Booth (In Re Booth)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1987
  2. Heinold Hog Market, Inc. v. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. National Commodity and Barter Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
  4. Mahon v. HarstColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Heinold Hog Market, Inc. v. Dennis J. McCoy A/K/A Denny McCoy Janet E. McCoy A/K/A Janet McCoy and George Herrmann v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Company, Larry D. Martin and John E. Grandbouche, Witnesses-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API