Schoff v. Richter
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
This appeal has been taken from an order entered by the trial court which affirmed an earlier order directing Appellee to provide $300.00 per month for the support of his three children. Upon review we find that this appeal must be quashed.
Subsequent to the filing of a Complaint for support, a conference was held and a hearing officer recommended that Appellee be required to pay $300 per month for the support of his three children. The parties were given ten days to file a written demand for a hearing before the court to review this recommended order. Such a demand was made, a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fortune/Forsythe v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MoirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Estate of Haiko v. McGinleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Valley Forge Center Associates v. Rib-It/K.P., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Shapiro v. Center Tp., Butler CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.