Legal Opinion

Misenheimer v. University of South Carolina

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided September 13, 2023No. 3:20-cv-04487Unknown

1Opinion

Ss Syne /S ny Cori” IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION JAIME SUSANNE MISENHEIMER, § Plaintiff, § § vs. § § Civil Action No. 3:20-04487-MGL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA and § DAVID W. VOROS, § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE EXTENT PROVIDED HEREIN Plaintiff Jaime Susanne Misenheimer (Misenheimer) filed this job discrimination employment action against her former employer, Defendant University of South Carolina (USC), and Defendant David W. Voros (Voros). The matter is before the Court for review of two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Cyrus Jonathan GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Camp v. Springs Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Eldeco, Inc. v. Charleston County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Bocook Outdoor Media, Inc. v. Summey Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API