Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rowles v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 16, 1946No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, J.

This is a contest between divorced parents over the custody of their daughter, Karen Rowles, aged eleven years. The father, Carl Bowles, prosecutes this appeal in error from a judgment granting the exclusive custody to his former wife, Doris Bowles Bey-nolds.

A divorce was granted the wife, for causes not appearing in the present record, on June 22, 1939. On September 2, 1939, an agreed order was entered giving the principal custody to. the father. In October 1939, Bowles was married to his present wife and sometime thereafter moved to Alexandria, Virginia, his present place of residence. On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Hicks v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  3. Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Brock v. BrockWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. McCann v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Selvey v. SelveyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Clothier v. ClothierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  3. State ex rel. Sprague v. BucherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  4. Dunavant v. DunavantCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  5. Clothier v. ClothierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API