Legal Opinion

United States v. Central Stockholders Corp. of Vallejo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1931No. 6422PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Preliminary to the statement of facts, we quote from the appellant’s brief its statement of the nature and purposes of the action, without adopting that statement:

“This is a suit by the United States.
“(1) To quiet title to public lands and to the use of the waters thereof; and
“(2) To determine and enforce the right of the United States to regulate and use the waters of the San Joaquin River.
“(a) For power purposes on its riparian lands, under its constitutional power to dispose of the public domain, and
“(b) For navigation purposes on the lower part of said stream, under…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Rank v. KrugDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950
  3. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. DawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. PPL MONTANA, LLC v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County v. City of Seattle, City of Seattle v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API