Legal Opinion

State v. Dana

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1910No. 8806PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for. King county, Frater, J., entered October 31, 1908, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of obtaining money under false pretenses.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

This was a prosecution for the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses. The- representations or pretenses set forth in the information were three in number: viz., that the defendants were the owners of a certain lot,, described as lot 1 of block 84 of McNaught’s addition, to Central Seattle; that the lot was of the value of $250, and that a certain lot situated near the intersection of Walker street and 23d avenue in that city was pointed out to the prosecuting witness by the defendant Dana as and for the *31lot in question. The information charged the falsity of the representations or…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LeroyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. BairdWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. MacleodWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State v. O'DonnellWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. StevensonWashington Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API