Legal Opinion

Baker v. Swift

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1906No. 14,544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: William A. Redick, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, C.

The action is one to recover damages for a personal injury which the plaintiff claims to have sustained on account of the negligence of the defendant. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the jury ivere instructed to return a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

The only testimony in the record is that of the plaintiff himself, and it tends to prove that the plaintiff ivas employed in the liog-killing department of the defendant, A\rho is engaged in operating a packing house in South Omaha. He was employed in-the same room with some 40 or 50 other workmen, all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Butler v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. O'Neil v. Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1904
  3. Kitchen Bros. Hotel v. Dixon ex rel. KimmelNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United Benefit Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Scott v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API