Legal Opinion
Timberlake v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided March 5, 1943No. 19PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEWEY, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, F. A. Timberlake, Louis Jagels and Frank Cannop, bring this action for and on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated, as plaintiffs, against Day & Zimmerman, Inc., as defendant, to recover wages which they claim are due them under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
Defendant is engaged in the processing of war materials for the use of the armed forces of the United States and operates a plant owned by the Government in or near the city of Burlington, Iowa, and known as the “Iowa Ordnance Plant.”
The matter came…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Walling v. Haile Gold Mines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Bell v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Paula I. WHATLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Burke v. Mesta MacH. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.