Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, A.F.L.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1954No. 12434_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
Respondents are Retail Clerks International Association, AFL (herein “International”), Retail Clerks’ Union Local 648, AFL (herein “Local”), which is an affiliate of International, and certain officials of those labor organizations. From 1937 until. 1948 Local held collective bargaining contracts with Safeway .and most of, the other retail grocery store operators in San Francisco County. Local represented and its contracts covered all the employees in these stores with the exception of butchers. In the summer of 1948, during the course of negotiations with Local for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, A.F.L., Retail Clerks Union Local 648Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, A.F.L., Retail Clerks Union, Local 648Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by19 opinions
- McMullen v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Richfield Oil Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wheeling Electric Company, National Labor Relations Board v. Wheeling Electric Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Gaf Corporation, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Shelofsky v. HelsbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.