Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, A.F.L., Retail Clerks Union, Local 648

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1951No. 12434PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

On November 3, 1949, the above named Board made an order directing that the respondents shall not “(b) Refuse to bargain collectively with Safeway for the employees in the unit described in paragraph IV of the stipulation in case No. 20-CB-43 by insisting or demanding as a condition to such bargaining that Safeway bargain collectively for supervisory employees of Safeway within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Act [29 U.S.C.A. § 152].” Thereafter, upon petition to this court for a decree enforcing the order, this court entered its decree containing the same prohibitory language quoted…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, A.F.L.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, A.F.L., Retail Clerks Union Local 648Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, A.F.L.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API