Legal Opinion

Privett v. Privett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1923No. 12503PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from District Court, Grant County ; J. W. Bird, Judge. Action by Mary E„ Privett against Waiter J. Privett for divorce, division of property, and alimony. . Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DICKSON, C.

On the 3rd'day of March, 1921, the plaintiff in error, Mary E. Privett, commenced her action in .-the district court of Grant county, against the defendant' in error, Walter J. Privett, for a divorce, a division of certain property, alleged to have, been accumulated by the joint industry of the parties, and alimony.

The parties will be referred to. hereafter as plaintiff and defendant, as they were designated in the trial court. The cause for divorce set out in the plaintiff’s petition was abandonment. The defendant denied generally the allegations contained in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Woodworth, County Clerk v. Town of HennesseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Hildebrand v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. Van Brunt v. Van BruntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Harden v. HardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Hughes v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Finley v. FinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Gilcrease v. GilcreaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API