Legal Opinion

Frazier v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 21, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, Presiding Judge.

We consider two petitions for postcon-viction relief by Dewey Scott Frazier.

The first attacks his life sentence on the ground that the habitual criminal statute, T.C.A. 40-2801, et seq., constitutes cruel and unusual treatment in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. He also says the statute violates Article 1, Section 9(3) of the United States Constitution as an ex post facto law. His conviction was affirmed by this court. Frazier v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 466 S.W.2d 535.

The trial judge granted an evidentiary hearing and Frazier was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Frazier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  5. Canupp v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pearson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  3. Hobby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  4. State v. RussellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  5. Mullins v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API