State v. Scott
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff State of Indiana (State) appeals the trial court’s grant of appellee-defendant Mershaun W. Scott’s motion to suppress. The State argues that the police officer at the scene had the requisite reasonable suspicion to approach Scott and later arrest him after smelling burnt marijuana in the vehicle. As a result, the State maintains that none of the police officer’s actions violated Scott’s rights under either the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution (Fourth Amendment) or Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution.
We concur with the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Robert LambertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Indiana v. Dylan S. Woolston (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Tony Lawrence Richey v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2023