Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Baldwin v. Curtis

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 19, 2008No. AC 27827Published

1ConcurrenceFlynn, C. J.

I respectfully write separately because although I concur with the holding of the majority that the motion for summary judgment should not have been granted at this time and would reverse the judgment of the trial court, I first would order further briefing on the applicability of the Landlord Tenant Act, General Statutes § 47a-l et seq., which appears to be the law to govern this residential landlord tenant case.

Although the plaintiff, Shirley A. Baldwin, claimed that the duty of her landlord was mandatory and nondel-egable, she cited no statutory authority for that proposition. It is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Pelletier v. SordoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Location Realty, Inc. v. General Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API