Cohen v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages caused, he alleges, by the use of “Cheer”, a product either manufactured, packaged, sold or distributed by defendant.1 Defendant moved for summary judgment under Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 56, 28 U.S.C. because it does not manufacture, package, or advertise the product, but purchases it in sealed packages from the manufacturer and in turn sells and distributes it throughout the country. Plaintiff then directed certain interrogatories to defendant under FR 33 designed to ascertain the inter-corporate relationship of defendant, The Proctor and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cohen v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- Cohen v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- Essex Wire Corp. v. Eastern Electric Sales Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Cofer v. County of PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973