Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 5, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 1590PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages caused, he alleges, by the use of “Cheer”, a product either manufactured, packaged, sold or distributed by defendant.1 Defendant moved for summary judgment under Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 56, 28 U.S.C. because it does not manufacture, package, or advertise the product, but purchases it in sealed packages from the manufacturer and in turn sells and distributes it throughout the country. Plaintiff then directed certain interrogatories to defendant under FR 33 designed to ascertain the inter-corporate relationship of defendant, The Proctor and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
  2. Cohen v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Essex Wire Corp. v. Eastern Electric Sales Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Cofer v. County of PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API