First Peoples Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cogdell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The first issue submitted to the jury was, “Were the obligations of Defendants James and Rosa Cogdell under the installment sales contract supported by consideration?” Plaintiffs contend that they were entitled to a directed verdict on this issue, and that the court’s charge on the issue was incorrrect.
The installment sale contract was signed by all four defendants, as follows:
Buyer
Signs s/Carl Cyndyn Cogdell (Seal)
s/Martha Johnson Cogdell
Buyer
Signs s/James Eddie Cogdell (Seal)
s/Rosa B. . . Cogdell
Defendants James and Rosa Cogdell (defendants) aver by their third defense that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Loman-Garrett Supply Co., Inc. v. DudneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Alc Mfg., Inc. v. J. Streicher & Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2020
- Earp v. EarpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982