Legal Opinion
Camalier & Buckley, Inc. v. Sandoz & Lamberton, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 6, 1995No. 93-CV-306PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate a consent order and judgment for possession and to dismiss appellee’s underlying suit for possession of commercial property. We vacate the order denying the motion and remand for the limited purpose of allowing appellant an opportunity to present evidence that it made the rent arrearage payments prescribed by the consent order in timely fashion.
I
Appellee Sandoz & Lamberton, Inc. (San-doz) sued appellant Camalier & Buckley (Ca-malier) for possession of leased real estate and for unpaid rent, late…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trilon Plaza Co. v. Allstate Leasing Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Moore v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- District of Columbia v. Trustees of Amherst CollegeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- McBryde v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Har-Rich Realty Corporation v. American Consumer Industries, Inc. And Charles E. Pledger, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- 3511 13th Street Tenants' Ass'n v. 3511 13th Street, N.W. Residences, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Puckrein v. JenkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.