Legal Opinion
Rabenovets v. Crossland
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 16, 1943No. Nos. 8372, 8373PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Associate Justice.
An automobile driven by Harold Rabenovets struck and injured the minor appellee Richard Crossland. The minor and his father have recovered judgment against Harold’s brother Judas Rabenovets, who owned the car, and against Consolidated Home Equipment Corporation, which sometimes employed Harold Rabenovets as a salesman. Both defendants appeal.
The chief contention of appellant Rabenovets is that appellees should not *676have been permitted, under a complaint which charged a permanently shortened leg, to prove a pelvic tilt and spinal curvature. We need not decide whether…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- P. F. Collier & Son Co. v. HartfeilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Phelps v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bank of New York v. BrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Newman v. ZinnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Della Blackwell v. Regal Cab Company, Yurrissan Carter v. Regal Cab Company, Raoul D. Carter v. Regal Cab CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Iodice v. CalabreseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Yellow Cab Co. of D. C. v. RogersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.