Legal Opinion

United States v. One Chrysler Touring Sedan

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1936No. 3957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

This is an innocent owner’s petition by the Commercial Credit Company, based upon the provisions of section 204 (a) of the Act of August 27, 1935 (27 U.S.C.A. § 40a (a), for remission or mitigation of the forfeiture or proposed forfeiture of an automobile seized by the Constabulary of Pennsylvania in connection with the arrest of one Michael Tramantan for violation of the United States Internal Revenue Laws relating to liquor, and by the Constabulary of Pennsylvania turned over to the United States Law Enforcement Officers of the City of Wilkes Barre. Upon the petition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. 422 Casks of WineSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Wilson Motor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. One Hudson Sedan, Serial No. 960,905, Motor No. 44850District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. United States v. FarringtonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. United States v. One 1951 Chevrolet SedanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API