Wilson Motor Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court, declining to entertain an innocent owner’s petition, based upon the provisions of section 204 (a) of the Act of August 27, 1935 (27 U.S.C.A. § 40a (a), for remission or mitigation of the forfeiture of an automobile condemned under the provisions of sections 1440 and 1441, 26 U.S.C.A. The Act of August 27, 1935, conferring the power to act on the innocent owner’s petition was passed after the seizure but before the decree of forfeiture.
On April 16, 1935, the agents of the Alcohol Tax Unit seized a Ford Coach…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Guardian Trust & Deposit Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- CIT Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Universal Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. One 1936 Studebaker Sedan, Engine No. D-74084, Serial No. 5850480District Court, W.D. Washington · 1937
- United States v. One 1960 FordDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.