Application of Greider
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1DissentO’Connell, Judge
The court in the prevailing opinion has set forth and taken judicial notice of the new rule of the Patent Office by which claim 15 would be allowed if now presented there. The majority, however, have affirmed the decision of the Board of Appeals with respect to the rejection of that claim.
The ground stated for the affirmance is that the court is without jurisdiction to consider the change in the law effected by the new rule of practice in the Patent Office authorizing the allowance of the claim. The majority bases its position on the ground that the change in law had occurred after the appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Coschocton Glove Co. v. Buckeye Glove Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- In re LangsnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In re TerresCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945