Legal Opinion

In re Langsner

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 7, 1943No. 4807PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenRoot, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 9,10, 11,13, 14, and 17 to 23, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent.

The claims were rejected upon the ground that there is no patentable distinction between them and a count, No. 5, of an interference between a copending application of appellant and an application of another party. The interference had not been terminated when this appeal was taken. Said count 5 of the interference corresponded to original claim 8 of…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. Alumatone Corporation v. Vitavar CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Application of GreiderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  4. Application of BeltzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API