In re Langsner
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLenRoot, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 9,10, 11,13, 14, and 17 to 23, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent.
The claims were rejected upon the ground that there is no patentable distinction between them and a count, No. 5, of an interference between a copending application of appellant and an application of another party. The interference had not been terminated when this appeal was taken. Said count 5 of the interference corresponded to original claim 8 of…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Alumatone Corporation v. Vitavar CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Application of GreiderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of BeltzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.