Paul Casey v. McDonalds Corporation

I concur with the Court’s decision in full. I write separately to point out the District Court appeared to believe that the requisite standard of care could not be established with expert testimony regarding local, comparable facilities, because the plaintiff must proffer evidence of practices “across the nation.” See Casey v. Ward, 211 F.Supp.3d 107, 116 (D.D.C. 2016) (emphasis in original) (citing Beckwith v. Interstate Mgmt. Corp., LLC, 82 F.Supp.3d 255, 263-64 (D.D.C. 2016) (expert testimony of security practices of several hotels in Baltimore and Washington, D.C., areas “cannot be the…