Legal Opinion

Simches v. Simches

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 6, 1996PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

In this action the settlor and sole trustee of an irrevocable trust instrument seeks to reform the instrument by changing the remaindermen so as to accord with the settlor’s intentions and thus avoid tax consequences that were neither foreseen nor intended when the trust was created. The single justice reserved and reported this case without decision to us.

I

In 1992, the plaintiff established a qualified personal resi*684dence trust (QPR trust) pursuant to § 2702 of the Internal Revenue Code (1994) (I.R.C.), and transferred her Osterville vacation property into that trust. According to the terms…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Putnam v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Berman v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Clymer v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Babson v. BabsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Walker v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. BankBoston v. MarlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. DiCarlo v. MazzarellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Pond v. PondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Putnam v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API