Legal Opinion
Mark IV Properties, Inc. v. CLUB DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided July 22, 1981No. 19-00530PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AT TRIAL
JAMES W. MEYERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
I
This controversy involves the admissibility of certain depositions as evidence in the trial of the above referenced counterclaim. The depositions in question were all videotaped and were also all reported by conventional stenographic means. The debtor and counterclaimant, Club Development & Management Corporation, sought to introduce videotaped versions of the deposition testimony at that trial over the objection of the plaintiff and counterdefendant, Mark IV Properties, Inc., (“Mark…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,887 Sundstrand Corporation v. Sun Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Frank Coughlin, Padre Concrete Corporation, A. W. Van Cleave, Jr. And Allied Crushed Stone Company v. Capitol Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- George D. Hartman, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- R. Glen FENSTERMACHER, Appellant, v. PHILADELPHIA NATIONAL BANK and Carson Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- G.E.J. Corporation and M.F. Corporation v. Uranium Aire, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roland Sandidge v. Salen Offshore Drilling Company, Salen Protexa Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Huntington Center Partners, Ltd. v. Dupree (In Re Dupree)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- Ware v. HowellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005