Legal Opinion

Smith v. Tolversen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1934No. 29,440PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for amended findings or a new trial.

The action is one for an accounting against defendant as trustee of two trusts hereinafter mentioned. It was referred to Milo J. Meeker, Esq., of the Pipestone county bar, to take and report the evidence with findings of fact. His report was adopted by the court, and his findings made the basis of conclusions of law and order for judgment adverse to defendant.

Julius A. Smith died testate in Murray county in 1909. Defendant was the executor of his will. The residue of the estate was divided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. St. Paul Trust Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Minneapolis Trust Co. v. MenageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Ottawa Banking & Trust Co. v. Crookston State Bank Ex Rel. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Villa Site Co. v. CopelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Created by Will of EngerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Roberts v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In Re Estate of BinderOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Bishop v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Baxter v. Union Industrial Trust & Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API