Hand v. Hickok
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error fre m District Court, Tulsa County; Albert C. Hunt, Judge. Action by A. Hickok against W. H. Hand and Eula Hand. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
The defendant in error, as plaintiff brought this action ■ against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, in the district court of Tulsa county, to recover judgment on a promissory note executed to the plaintiff by the defendants on the 38th day of October, 1918, for the sum of $5,100, and interest, and attorneys fees as provided by the note, and also' f-or the purpose of foreclosing a mortgage on a certain lot in the city of Tulsa, which mortgage was given by the defendants to the plaintiff for the purpose of securing the said note.
It was alleged in the petition that no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Great Western Coal & Coke Co. v. SerbantasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Weleetka Light & Water Co. v. BurlesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Woods v. FaurotSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Farmers' Product & Supply Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Towne v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Baker v. JackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Texas Co. v. AlredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Frank v. HarjoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Town of Sentinel v. BoggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.