Legal Opinion

Ogden v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1897No. L. A. No. 106PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff had obtained a judgment in the superior court against one C. E. Packard in an *35action to foreclose a mortgage. Packard prosecuted an appeal to this court, and gave an undertaking for damages and costs and to stay execution, with defendants for sureties. The judgment was affirmed upon appeal, and this action is prosecuted against tlie sureties upon the undertaking. Plaintiff suffered nonsuit, and appeals from the judgment.

The complaint charges in two causes of action, the one for damages in the sum of $2,000 for waste suffered upon the land and premises; the other for a deficiency in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Irwin v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Murdock v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Elder v. KutnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Pierce v. WhitingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. German Loan Society v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Bradley Co. v. MulcrevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Curtin v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hammond v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API