Legal Opinion
In Re Outen
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 18, 1998No. 19-01278PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
THIS MATTER comes before the Court sitting en banc upon the objection of W. Ryan Hovis, the Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”) to the Debtor’s claim of exemption in an Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) with a value of $24,991.00. 1 The Debtor and the Trustee have stipulated that there were no factual disputes and that the legal issue could be ruled upon by the Court upon the submission of Stipulations of Fact and a proposed order outlining the parties’ respective positions. Therefore the Court adopts the parties’ Stipulations of Fact and makes the following Conclusions of Law.
STIPULATIONS…
3Cases cited32 opinions
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Charles W. Graham, Debtor. Edward F. Samore, Trustee v. Charles W. Graham, Trustee of the Charles W. Graham, M.D. Ltd. Profit Sharing Plan TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Kosta P. Velis, Debtor-Appellant v. Mary Kardanis, Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Postconfirmation FeesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1998
- Delaney v. Obuchowski (In Re Delaney)District Court, D. Vermont · 2001
- Hovis v. Wiggins (In Re Wiggins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1998