Legal Opinion

Junior College District of St. Louis v. Califano

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1979No. 78-1830PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant HEW appeals from the trial court’s 1 ruling that HEW does not have authority, under the Education *120Amendments of 1972, §§ 901-02, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-82, to regulate employment discrimination. We affirm.

HEW received a complaint of sex discrimination (equal pay) filed under Title IX, Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., by an employee (Assistant Dean for Financial Aid and Placement at Florissant Valley Campus) of plaintiff-appellee Junior College District of St. Louis. Upon investigation, HEW determined that there had been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Junior College Dist. of St. Louis v. CalifanoDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1978

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clinton C. Simpson v. Reynolds Metals Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  2. Weisbord v. Michigan State UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
  3. Grove City College v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Dougherty County School System v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Grove City College Ex Rel. Sickafuse v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API