Junior College District of St. Louis v. Califano
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant HEW appeals from the trial court’s 1 ruling that HEW does not have authority, under the Education *120Amendments of 1972, §§ 901-02, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-82, to regulate employment discrimination. We affirm.
HEW received a complaint of sex discrimination (equal pay) filed under Title IX, Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., by an employee (Assistant Dean for Financial Aid and Placement at Florissant Valley Campus) of plaintiff-appellee Junior College District of St. Louis. Upon investigation, HEW determined that there had been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Junior College Dist. of St. Louis v. CalifanoDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1978
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clinton C. Simpson v. Reynolds Metals Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Weisbord v. Michigan State UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
- Grove City College v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Dougherty County School System v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Grove City College Ex Rel. Sickafuse v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.