Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Houde

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 1, 1996No. 95-1853, 95-1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) appeals from an order, entered in the United States District Court for the District of Maine, dismissing its complaint to collect the amount due on a $275,000 promissory note executed in 1986 by defendants Roland and Ora Houde and made payable to the Maine National Bank, and to foreclose on the mortgage securing the Houdes’ indebtedness. The Houdes cross-appeal from the district court’s denial of four pretrial motions. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court’s order.

I

In November…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. World University Inc., Santa Barbara Center CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Patriot Cinemas, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for New Maine National Bank v. Roland Houde and Ora Houde, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for New Maine National Bank v. Roland Houde and Ora HoudeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. OCI Mortgage Corp. v. MarcheseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API