Hurley v. Eddingfield
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Baker, J.-j
Appellant sued appellee for $10,000 damages for wrongfully causing the dea[h of his intestate. The court sustained appellee’s demurrer to the complaint; and this ruling is assigned as error.
The material facts alleged may be summarized thus:' At and for years before decedent’s death appellee was a practicing physician at Mace in Montgomery county, duly licensed under the laws of the State. He held himself out to the public as a general practitioner of medicine. He had been decedent’s family physician. Decedent became dangerously ill and sent for appellee.. The messenger informed…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Palace Bar, Inc. v. FearnotIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- L.S. Ayres Company v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Lyons v. GretherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Velazquez Ex Rel. Velazquez v. JiminezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Hiser v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.