Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Eddingfield

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1901No. 19,154PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Prom the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Baker, J.-j

Appellant sued appellee for $10,000 damages for wrongfully causing the dea[h of his intestate. The court sustained appellee’s demurrer to the complaint; and this ruling is assigned as error.

The material facts alleged may be summarized thus:' At and for years before decedent’s death appellee was a practicing physician at Mace in Montgomery county, duly licensed under the laws of the State. He held himself out to the public as a general practitioner of medicine. He had been decedent’s family physician. Decedent became dangerously ill and sent for appellee.. The messenger informed…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Palace Bar, Inc. v. FearnotIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. L.S. Ayres Company v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lyons v. GretherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Velazquez Ex Rel. Velazquez v. JiminezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  5. Hiser v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API