Legal Opinion

Ervin, Cohen & Jessup, LLP v. Kassel

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 2007No. B191761PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, Acting P. J.

Ervin, Cohen & Jessup, LLP (EC&J), appeals from an order denying its motion to compel its former clients to arbitrate a dispute concerning legal fees and costs pursuant to an arbitration clause in a retainer agreement. Citing the Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act (MFAA), 1 the trial court concluded a predispute agreement for binding arbitration of a claim for unpaid fees and costs is unenforceable.

We find EC&J gave its former clients notice of their right to resolve the fee dispute via nonbinding arbitration under the MFAA. The clients failed to request such an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS, INC. v. CareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Schatz v. ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benjamin, Weill & Mazer v. KorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API