Legal Opinion

United States v. Stevens

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 17, 1988No. ACM 26080PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*627DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

It is a fundamental principle of military due process that a servicemember be afforded a reasonable opportunity to be represented by counsel of his choice. However, the right to counsel of one’s choice is not as absolute as is the right to the assistance of counsel. United States v. Mitchell, 111 F.2d 248 (5th Cir.1985). Further, when a continuance is sought to retain counsel, the right to select a particular attorney must be balanced against the public’s interest in the orderly administration of justice. Urquhart v. Lockhart, 726 F.2d 1316 (8th Cir.1984). The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. GarriesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. Curtis W. Urquhart v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. MenokenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. GarriesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. DresenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. MarshU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. WilsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. HamiltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API