Legal Opinion

Kanow v. Brownshadel

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 23, 1985No. 01-84-0735-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNN, Justice.

Appeal is taken from a judgment rendered by the court for appellee in an action to recover fees for legal services.

Appellant asserts in his first point of error that “there was insufficient evidence, or in the alternative, no evidence to support the trial court’s findings that a contract ever existed between the parties.”

The case was tried to the court and no findings of fact or conclusions of law were requested of or filed by the court. Therefore, the court’s judgment implies all necessary fact findings in support of the judgment. Renfro Drug Co. v. Lewis, 149 Tex. 507,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Burnett v. MotykaTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Scott v. Ingle Bros. Pacific, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bailey v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Bedenk v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Tanox, Inc. v. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. FORECA, SA v. GRD Development Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kohn v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Brown v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Scoville v. Shaffer, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API