Scott v. Ingle Bros. Pacific, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GREENHILL, Chief Justice.
The question before us is whether the parties had entered into a contract whereby Ingle Bros. Pacific, Inc., agreed to employ H. L. Scott. The trial court held that, as a matter of law, there was a contract of employment; and based on jury findings of a breach of the contract, it entered a judgment for Scott for some $54,210. The court of civil appeals completely disagreed. It held that as a matter of law there was no employment contract. 478 S.W.2d 210. We disagree with both courts. Our holding is that there is an issue of fact as to the intention of the parties.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Simmons & Simmons Construction Co. v. W. L. Rea D.B.A. W. L. Rea Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1955
- Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
- Haas Drilling Co. v. First National Bank in DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Ingle Bros. Pacific, Inc. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
3Cited by152 opinions
- Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Island Recreational Development Corp. v. Republic of Texas Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Farah v. Mafrige & Kormanik, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
- Fischer v. CTMI, L.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
- Pitman v. Lightfoot, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.