Legal Opinion

Gildner v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 14, 1937No. 420PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury in an action by a conductor in its employ, to recover for personal injuries suffered in a switching yard on the night of January 11, 1934. The yard was full of tracks, and the freight train of which the plaintiff was in charge, came in and stopped upon one, called the “passing siding track,” just north of the main, or through, track. The plaintiff’s first duty was to check the new cars which he was to'take on, and to do so he went south across the main track to the tracks of another…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Van Derveer v. Delaware, L. &. W. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Owens v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co. v. BallardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  3. Grosvener v. New York Cent. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Henwood v. CoburnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  5. Kurn v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API