Legal Opinion

State v. Chew

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 1, 2014No. 2013AP2592PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUBAUER, PJ.

¶ 1. This case is about Wisconsin's new "castle doctrine" statute, Wis. Stat. § 939.48(lm) (2011-12).1 The new law generally provides that use of force is presumably justified when a *371person is defending himself or herself against an unlawful and forcible intruder in that person's home. Charles Chew was tried for recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon, based on shots he fired at two men from the front door of his apartment complex as they were fleeing through a parking lot. Chew challenges the trial court's decision not to give an instruction under the "castle…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. CastilloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. George Brown v. Cheryl EplettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  2. Krueger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. Robert Joseph StietzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. MouthCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
  5. Mouth, Sophea v. Fuchs, LarryDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API