State v. Chew
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
NEUBAUER, PJ.
¶ 1. This case is about Wisconsin's new "castle doctrine" statute, Wis. Stat. § 939.48(lm) (2011-12).1 The new law generally provides that use of force is presumably justified when a *371person is defending himself or herself against an unlawful and forcible intruder in that person's home. Charles Chew was tried for recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon, based on shots he fired at two men from the front door of his apartment complex as they were fleeing through a parking lot. Chew challenges the trial court's decision not to give an instruction under the "castle…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CastilloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- George Brown v. Cheryl EplettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Krueger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. Robert Joseph StietzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. MouthCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
- Mouth, Sophea v. Fuchs, LarryDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.