Legal Opinion
Vargas v. Hill
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 29, 2001No. 98 Civ. 3377(VM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ruben D. Vargas alleges that defendants District Council 37, SSEU Local 371 and Stanley Hill discriminated against him based on his national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and that they breached the duty of fail' representation in the handling of certain grievances he filed against his employer, the City of New York. Before the Court is defendants’ summary judgment motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
FAC…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bradshaw v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007