Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Carter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 23, 1993No. 1910887PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari review in this case to examine one question: Is a Batson violation established if the defendant can show that one black veniremember was struck because of her race?1 We affirm.

Bennie Mack Carter was indicted and was convicted on four counts of first degree robbery and one count of attempted murder. During his trial, after the voir dire examination, his counsel made a timely Batson challenge to one of the prosecutor's peremptory strikes:

"MR. LENTINE [defense attorney]: . . . Judge, I'm raising a Batson objection. As the court knows even one strike —
"THE COURT: No, siree,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Ex Parte BirdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Kynard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Jessie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. MacOn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API