Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 14, 2004No. CA CR 03-730PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

Appellant Anarian Chad Jackson entered a conditional guilty plea to a charge of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver following the denial of his motion to suppress. For reversal, Jackson raises three points on appeal. He argues that: (1) his initial detention was an unconstitutional seizure; (2) his consent to search his bag was ineffective; and (3) the method by which he was Mirandized rendered the warnings ineffective such that his subsequent statements were illegally obtained. Because we agree with Jackson that his initial detention was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Baxter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Hammons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API