Legal Opinion

United States v. Carol A. Miller A/K/A Carol Miller Salemo

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 5, 1995No. 95-1039PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

In this criminal case, defendant contends that the trial court erred when it denied her request for an individual jury poll and instead conducted a collective inquiry. In the circumstances, we conclude that the trial court did not commit reversible error, but we adopt a prospective supervisory rule requiring that jurors shall be polled individually rather than collectively. We also affirm the trial court’s rulings rejecting a duress defense and permitting the government to call a witness whom it had impeached in a previous trial.

Defendant Carol A.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Mesarosh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. Corrine Marie Denardi, Gary R. Tuttle, Cindy L. Scandreth, A/K/A Cindy L. Redding. Appeal of Cindy L. ReddingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Cabberiza v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Harold Wayne Nichols v. Stanton Heidle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API