Legal Opinion
Tessy Plastics Corp. v. State Division of Human Rights
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 1979PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*791OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Consideration of two issues is dispositive of this appeal. In the first place we find no abuse of discretion or other error of law in the determination by the Appellate Division to vacate the default judgment at Supreme Court. We find no sufficient reason to reject the conclusions of the Appellate Division that there was such excusable default on the part of respondents and such merit to the contention that the State Division of Human Rights should not be precluded from further proceedings with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Union Free School District No. 6 v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Board of Education v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Board of Education of the Syracuse City School District v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by43 opinions
- Sarkisian Bros. v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Pilgrim v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Murphy v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- 140 West 57th Street Corp. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Callaghan v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.